Public costs and private benefits: The governance of energy efficiency in India

Mathur, A (2019) Public costs and private benefits: The governance of energy efficiency in India. Building Research & Information, 47(1), pp. 123-126. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

India has demonstrated that it is possible to reduce energy demand and increase the energy efficiency of its buildings, particularly for air-conditioning appliances. Given the rapid and large expected increase in India's building stock over the next 20 or more years, the opportunity exists to make significant increases in overall energy efficiency and reduce energy demand through the application of its Energy Conservation Building Code that influences the design, construction and operation of buildings. However, the responsibility for this code resides with local authorities (urban local bodies) that currently lack sufficient incentive to implement and enforce it. To overcome this impediment, it is argued here that important benefits can be captured by local authorities to implement energy-conservation measures: increased revenues from taxes, improved attractiveness to business and citizens, and the introduction of automation to reduce transaction costs in the building-approval process. Large parts of the country's property (real estate) are yet to be built, providing a valuable opportunity to transition to low-energy and climate-friendly solutions in India's rapidly growing building stock.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building regulations; buildings; energy demand; energy efficiency; energy policy; governance; India; local authorities
Index terms: building code, transaction cost, approval, energy policy, revenue, local authority, building stock, real estate, energy conservation, conservation, automation, India, governance, energy demand, building regulation, energy efficiency
Subjects: Geography, automation and robotics, financial analysis, regulatory law, asset management, sociology, business, contractual role, economic analysis, energy systems, real estate economics, sustainability and energy, public policy, environmental policy
Topics: Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here