Impacts of energy legislation on organizational motivation: A case study

Roberts, C; Bobrova, Y and Marjanovic-Halburd, L (2019) Impacts of energy legislation on organizational motivation: A case study. Building Research & Information, 47(2), pp. 234-244. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

In an attempt to reduce operational energy use in non-domestic buildings and mitigate climate change, the UK government has introduced Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS) legislation to motivate large organizations to implement energy-efficiency (EE) measures. However, evidence suggests that an organization’s behaviour with regard to EE measures does not follow rational cost minimization, demonstrating potential ESOS weakness. A case study is presented that assesses whether ESOS can lead to EE measures deployment despite different overarching agendas. A generic qualitative approach is used to assess the change within the organization; auto-ethnomethodology was used to assess the change within its facility management (FM). The results demonstrate that the energy audit delivered through an agenda of cost minimization was weak in creating organizational behaviour change. However, the ESOS audit along with the research process led to a mindset change of the FM, resetting an overarching agenda from cost minimization to co-evolution between a building and its occupants, further empowering the FM to facilitate behavioural change within the whole organization. These findings suggest that the success of EE policies can increase if policies shift from understanding end-users as passive to proactive and capable of shaping better outcomes for themselves and their organizations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; energy efficiency; energy legislation; energy performance; facility management; middle-out; organizational change; public policy
Index terms: evolution, evidence, public policy, climate change, organizational change, legislation, minimization, mindset, motivation, energy-saving, energy performance, energy use, ethnomethodology, behavioural change, energy efficiency, efficiency, case study, qualitative approach, organizational behaviour, non-domestic building, energy audit, audit
Subjects: behavioral psychology, performance management, algorithms, research methods, performance measurement, sustainability and energy, public policy, psychology, legal systems, environmental science, energy systems, business, construction type, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, climate science
Topics: Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here