Design for producing vertical non-loadbearing masonry: Scope analysis

Jnior, A C L and Melhado, S B (2011) Design for producing vertical non-loadbearing masonry: Scope analysis. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(4), pp. 275-284. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The design for producing non-loadbearing masonry offers high potential for improving the design process in building construction. However, one of the problems worth mentioning is the lack of accurate definition of the scope, causing doubts about what, when and how it should be prepared, developed and delivered by the designers. The main purpose of this article is to investigate and analyse the application of the scopes of the designs of vertical non-loadbearing masonry (DPVM) in building construction using case studies in the cities of Recife and Sao Paulo in Brazil. The results obtained have shown that conformity (meeting the specifications) the reference scope adopted-the Brazilian Association of Design Managers and Coordinators (AGESC) handbook-averaged 61% (construction companies) and 57% (designers), while the agreement (personal opinion on the appropriateness of the specification) with the scope averaged 45% (construction companies) and 56% (designers). A wider difference was found between conformity and agreement among the construction companies compared to the DPVM designers. Lastly, it gives guidelines on the scope of how to use the AGESC handbook on DPVM, describing potential uses and stressing the contributions to greater integration between expectations and resulting products, to more rationally facilitate the design and execution of non-loadbearing masonry in building construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building; construction; design scope; non-loadbearing masonry
Index terms: design manager, specification, case study, design process, Brazil, building construction, designer, construction company, integration
Subjects: building construction, organizational analysis, Geography, contractual condition, organization, profession, data collection methods, design methods
Topics: Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here