The role of social sustainability in building assessment

Stender, M and Walter, A (2019) The role of social sustainability in building assessment. Building Research & Information, 47(5), pp. 598-610. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Can social sustainability be built? What are the challenges and potential for incorporating the concept of social sustainability into the assessment of building projects? Theoretical approaches to social sustainability are examined for the ways it is applied in practice by building industry stakeholders. A fundamental question is whether and how social sustainability can be measured, assessed and certified in the construction or renewal of housing and neighbourhoods. In addition to physical and functional indicators, it is suggested that certification systems (e.g. the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen–DGNB) should also reward social initiatives. A framework was developed involving 12 indicators grouped three overarching themes: social cohesion; participatory processes; and accessibility to living opportunities. A collaborative case study project involving two Danish social housing neighbourhoods examines how social sustainability indicators could be integrated into the application of certification systems such as the DGNB and whether the certification system can be improved by integrating social and organizational aspects with the existing criteria for physical and functional layout. It is found that certifications must take the housing complex or neighbourhood's relationship with the surrounding city into account, as well as its development over time and flexibility towards future needs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment tool; building assessment; housing; neighbourhoods; social equity; sustainability assessment systems; sustainability criteria; sustainable development goals
Index terms: case study, accessibility, organizational aspect, social housing, sustainable development goal, building industry, social sustainability, certification, sustainability assessment, building assessment, housing, renewal, social cohesion
Subjects: business, construction type, data collection methods, sustainable design, inclusive design, sustainability assessment, renovation and retrofit, industry analysis, administrative processes, communities and social development, sociology, asset management, housing and residential development
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here