Embedding building performance evaluation in UK architectural practice and beyond

Stevenson, F (2019) Embedding building performance evaluation in UK architectural practice and beyond. Building Research & Information, 47(3), pp. 305-317. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Despite repeated efforts to foreground post-occupancy evaluation (POE) in many countries, few have any policy or legislation in place to mandate this process. Large-scale voluntary efforts have also failed to provide successful templates through which to mainstream broader building performance evaluation (BPE) activity within which POE sits. This paper reviews various programmes and initiatives in the UK that have attempted to embed first POE, then BPE, over the last 20 years within a global context, using a practice-based approach based on the author’s experience of working in the field over this period. Key findings are: a failure of government to systemically follow through on BPE initiatives; stakeholders operating independently of each other; lack of institutional engagement in the education sector as a key driver for BPE; and the potential for interdisciplinary models to embrace all members of the design team as well as the client. The means by which BPE has been successfully embedded into practice directly is examined through deep organizational learning and knowledge-exchange activities. Recommendations for these models to be replicated through professional institutions, other learning organizations and regulatory frameworks in the UK are presented as a constructive way forward.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building evaluation; building performance; knowledge exchange; learning; post-occupancy evaluation; practice
Index terms: architectural practice, knowledge exchange, organizational learning, design team, legislation, programme, building evaluation, mandate, building performance, building performance evaluation, post-occupancy evaluation
Subjects: quality assurance, asset management, building performance, professional development, business, political science, legal systems, evaluation methods, project controls, knowledge management, professional practice
Topics: Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Time Control, Governance, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here