Sweetnam, T; Spataru, C; Barrett, M and Carter, E (2019) Domestic demand-side response on district heating networks. Building Research & Information, 47(4), pp. 330-343. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Results are presented from a field study that deployed demand-shifting technology on a sample of 28 homes connected to a district heating (DH) network in England over the winter of 2015/16. The study’s aim was to improve the load factor of the participating households. This has the potential to improve the attractiveness of DH and accelerate the roll out of DH networks. Capital costs are lowered by reducing required boiler capacity and pipework sizes. Operational costs are reduced by increasing the coverage of the primary plant and reducing heat losses and pumping energy. The interventions were found to increase the load factor of the participating homes from 0.29 to 0.44. This led to an increased energy demand of approximately 3%; however, the estimated network cost savings exceed this amount. While some participants noted the altered operation of their heating systems and expressed concern, the majority indicated they would be willing to participate in a commercial scheme for a small financial reward. In addition to specific insights for the deployment of demand shifting on DH networks, the results provide general lessons for the utilization of building thermal inertia for demand shifting.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | behaviours; buildings; control systems; demand-side response; district heating; energy demand; energy efficiency; occupant behaviour; smart grids |
| Index terms: | household, occupant behaviour, cost saving, heating system, energy demand, energy efficiency, England, control system, capital cost, field study, winter, district heating |
| Subjects: | research methods, accounting and finance, economics, monitoring and control, Geography, demography, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, sustainability and energy, energy systems |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here