Tjørring, L and Gausset, Q (2019) Drivers for retrofit: A sociocultural approach to houses and inhabitants. Building Research & Information, 47(4), pp. 394-403. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Private households constitute approximately 30% of the total energy consumption in Denmark. The greatest potential for reducing energy consumption in private households is through retrofits of existing houses. One of the most common ways to promote retrofits is the act of sending an energy advisor to visit homeowners in order to explain the technological and economic advantages that arise from undertaking a retrofit. However, little is known about how homeowners make sense of retrofits. Based on an extensive anthropological fieldwork study of 12 Danish homeowners who had received energy advice, retrofits were investigated from the perspective of the everyday life of homeowners. Three social dimensions that played an important role when the people in the study discussed house renovation were identified and discussed: houses as part of homeowners' life cycles and personal events; houses as frameworks for social relations; and houses as markers of social values and status. These results indicate a need to develop new strategies to promote retrofits more effectively, which focus less on the techno-economic aspects and more on the social dimensions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Denmark; home; homeowners; house; household energy; motivation; refurbishment; retrofit; social factors |
| Index terms: | social value, marker, energy consumption, household, renovation, dimension, social factor, everyday life, life cycle, Denmark, homeowner, motivation, strategy |
| Subjects: | value management, psychology, health monitoring assessment and metrics, energy systems, renovation and retrofit, management, probability and distributions, Geography, sociology, demography |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here