Utilizing modulating-temperature setpoints to save energy and maintain alliesthesia-based comfort

Traylor, C; Zhao, W and Tao, Y X (2019) Utilizing modulating-temperature setpoints to save energy and maintain alliesthesia-based comfort. Building Research & Information, 47(2), pp. 190-201. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

One area with the greatest potential for energy savings in buildings is heating and cooling. However, it is often argued that any energy-saving techniques should not have a negative impact on comfort for inhabitants. This is where the concept of alliesthesia comes into play. This paper examines the impact of utilizing modulating temperature setpoints to take advantage of the pleasure experienced through change. Simulations were conducted using EnergyPlus to explore the potential for energy savings. It was found that savings of up to 5–15% could be achieved by modulating indoor temperatures in cooling applications. However, modulating temperature setpoints resulted in larger energy usage than constant setpoints in heating applications. Results from human comfort experiments show that modulating temperatures could lead to greater thermal pleasure than a constant temperature environment for cooling situations due to a resetting of the thermal comfort achieved when the indoor temperature is decreased. However, the same comfort benefits are not shown for heating situations. Nonetheless, the simulations and the comfort experiments together show potential for both energy savings and increased human comfort levels in cooling applications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: alliesthesia; buildings; cooling; energy reduction; heating and cooling; indoor environmental quality; space heating; thermal comfort
Index terms: indoor temperature, energy reduction, experiment, space heating, thermal pleasure, energyplus, savings, energy-saving, indoor environmental quality, comfort, thermal comfort
Subjects: building performance, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, environmental engineering, mechanical systems, data collection methods, economic analysis, environmental science, energy systems
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here