Weijs-Perrée, M; van de Koevering, J; Appel-Meulenbroek, R and Arentze, T (2019) Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), pp. 534-548. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Over the past decades, the use of mobile technology has increased and the attitude towards work has changed, making it possible to work anywhere at any time. However, workers still seek work environments that stimulate networking and collaboration possibilities. This has led to the growing popularity of co-working spaces. However, little is known about the specific preferences of co-working space users. The aim of this research is to analyse user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Stated choice data were collected by means of a questionnaire which was completed by 219 respondents of 25 co-working spaces in the Netherlands. A mixed-multinomial logit model was used to analyse the user preferences. Results show that the main motivations for co-workers to work in a co-working space were that they were looking for a workplace outside their home that allows them to work in an inspiring work environment where the accommodation is affordable. Accessibility and atmosphere/interior are the most important characteristics when choosing a specific co-working space. These results provide owners or managers of co-working spaces with clear insights about how to cope with co-worker preferences by offering co-working spaces with good accessibility by car and public transport, a semi-open layout and a homelike interior.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | co-working; mixed-logit model; multi-tenant offices; offices; stated-choice method; user preferences; workplace design |
| Index terms: | preference, workplace design, questionnaire, multinomial, collaboration, motivation, multi-tenant office, networking, Netherlands, public transport, manager, work environment, co-working, user preference, owner, mobile technology, accessibility |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, inclusive design, management, design practice, Geography, sociology, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, client relations, data collection methods, construction type, practitioner, psychology, digital technology, communication |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here