Occupants' comfort and stress indices in a structural timber school building in the Northeast US in different seasons

Adekunle, T O (2020) Occupants' comfort and stress indices in a structural timber school building in the Northeast US in different seasons. Building Research & Information, 48(3), pp. 331-348. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The study examines stress indices and occupants' comfort in a cross-laminated timber school building in the Northeast US in different seasons. The case study has won different awards for its sustainability credentials and use of structural timber for the construction. The environmental parameters were measured in the cold and warm periods. Thermal comfort models were applied to evaluate the occupants' comfort. The stress indices were computed using the Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature and Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) models. The average internal temperatures of 20.2°C and 22.5°C were measured in the cold and warm periods. In the cold and warm seasons, the mean relative humidity values were 43.6% and 58.3%, respectively. Lower and higher temperatures were noted during the occupied and non-occupied hours, which can cause warm and cold discomfort. The proposed Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature and UTCI in the warm period are 3.4°C and 3.0°C higher than the values computed for the cold season. The overall results showed that no thermal stress is predicted in the spaces. The study recommends that designers should consider thorough assessments before recommending interventions in buildings. The study also suggests that occupants should be enabled to adjust the thermal environment of buildings outside the occupied hours.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cross-laminated timber; school buildings; occupant comfort; stress indices; universal thermal climate index models; warm and cold periods; wet-bulb globe temperature
Index terms: school building, thermal comfort, case study, comfort, discomfort, cross-laminated timber, thermal environment, relative humidity, designer
Subjects: data collection methods, profession, construction type, environmental engineering, health risk and incident analysis, occupational health and safety management, air quality, building materials
Topics: Construction Technology, Design Practice, Sustainability, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here