Avoiding overheating in existing school buildings through optimized passive measures

Camacho-Montano, S C; Cook, M and Wagner, A (2020) Avoiding overheating in existing school buildings through optimized passive measures. Building Research & Information, 48(4), pp. 349-363. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The retrofitting strategies in European school buildings are usually focused on reducing the heating demand since it represents the major energy consumption. Nevertheless, the rise in outdoor temperatures shows that the risk of overheating during the summer is increasing. When planning such processes, decision-makers need to take into account the different building typologies, the effect of the potential measures in the future conditions and their costs. This study integrates these factors and provides specific guidance on the most appropriate measures to improve indoor thermal comfort in classrooms in the city of Karlsruhe, Germany. The simulations suggested that current overheating of the studied buildings represents up to 27% of the occupied time. The heavyweight buildings could prevent overheating by means of good ventilation, while lightweight buildings require more sun protection. With the appropriate natural ventilation strategy and with the help of ceiling fans, overheating can be avoided in most of the building types in the near future. In the case of lightweight buildings, overheating can be reduced to less than 10% of discomfort during occupied time; however, it would be required to significantly reduce the solar gains through technologies such as electrochromic glazing or a combination of other passive measures.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: passive cooling; refurbishment; school classrooms; thermal comfort
Index terms: overheating, strategy, ventilation, retrofitting, classroom, school classroom, school building, Germany, natural ventilation, glazing, ceiling fan, discomfort, sun, energy consumption, thermal comfort, building typology, summer
Subjects: environmental engineering, thermal systems, Geography, architectural elements, management, health risk and incident analysis, renovation and retrofit, energy systems, climate science, air quality, mechanical systems, construction type
Topics: Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here