Comparative analysis of passivhaus simulated and measured overheating frequency in a typical dwelling in Ireland

Finegan, E; Kelly, G and O’Sullivan, G (2020) Comparative analysis of passivhaus simulated and measured overheating frequency in a typical dwelling in Ireland. Building Research & Information, 48(6), pp. 681-699. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) simulations are crucial in balancing a reduced space heat demand and reduced overheating in Passivhaus dwellings. This paper identifies the PHPP simulated overheating frequency (OF) for a dwelling in Douglas, Cork, Ireland, constructed in 2015. The measured indoor temperature is also recorded over a 12-month period. A comparative analysis of measured and simulated overheating is carried out, with two overheating thresholds of 25°C and 24°C. The simulation estimates an OF of 0.00%, for a typical year (at 25°C). The simulation relies on a dwelling average temperature, where the equivalent measured OF for the test year is 2.64%, derived from a volume-weighted mean indoor temperature (T vm). At a reduced threshold of 24°C, the measured OF is 4.67%. Measurements within 6 independent zones identify 52.61% of readings above 25°C are eliminated by using T vm. The representation of overheating as a percentage of the year is shown to distort the effect of overheating, while the T vm value overlooks variations in zonal temperature. This paper recommends that a more robust assessment tool is developed within PHPP, to predict OF for passive house dwellings, while adopting this methodology for dwellings of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEB) standard.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: climate change; nzeb; overheating; passivhaus
Index terms: methodology, variation, Passivhaus, climate change, nearly zero-energy building, indoor temperature, overheating, comparative analysis, passive house, estimate, Ireland, passivhaus dwelling, package
Subjects: climate science, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, environmental science, financial and cost management, energy efficiency, research methods, contractual condition, Geography, health safety and environment, thermal systems
Topics: Design Practice, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here