A framework of developing machine learning models for facility life-cycle cost analysis

Gao, X and Pishdad-Bozorgi, P (2020) A framework of developing machine learning models for facility life-cycle cost analysis. Building Research & Information, 48(5), pp. 501-525. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Machine learning techniques have been used for predicting facility-related costs but there is a lack of research on developing machine learning models for the complete life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis of facilities. This research aims to systematically investigate the feasibility of forecasting facilities' LCC by implementing machine learning on historical data. The authors propose a comprehensive and generalizable framework for developing facility LCC analysis machine learning models. This framework specifies the data requirements, methods, and expected results in each step of the model development process. First, a literature review and a questionnaire survey were conducted to determine the independent variables affecting facility LCC and to identify the potential data sources. The process of using raw data to derive LCC components is then discussed. Finally, a proof-of-concept case study was conducted on a university campus to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework. This research concludes that current building systems already contain the data for LCC analysis and that the proposed framework is effective in facility LCC prediction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: data availability; facility management; life-cycle cost; machine learning
Index terms: survey, literature review, cost analysis, machine learning, model development, questionnaire, independent variable, case study, forecasting, building system
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, artificial intelligence, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, analytical methods, engineering systems, data collection methods, statistical analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here