Higuera-Trujillo, J L; Llinares Millán, C; Montañana i Aviñó, A and Rojas, J C (2020) Multisensory stress reduction: A neuro-architecture study of paediatric waiting rooms. Building Research & Information, 48(3), pp. 269-285. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The implementation of environmental satisfaction sources in the design of a health centre is a means to achieve stress reduction. The present work analyses the effect that these sources have on the stress reduction of patients' companions in a paediatric service. A two-phase study was carried out. During the first phase, 120 participants assessed 20 waiting rooms in situ in order to select the environmental sources with the greatest effect. During the second phase, the stress levels of 26 participants were measured in four simulated waiting rooms that combined the selected sources from the first phase. A multisensory simulation was carried out through a virtual reality experiment with visual, auditory and olfactory elements, and stress levels were measured at the psychological and neurophysiological levels. Results suggest that a combination of environmental satisfaction sources creates an important synergistic effect at the psychological and neurophysiological levels and underlines the importance of auditory and olfactory stimuli. Conclusions may be of interest to designers and managers of healthcare facilities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | healthcare; multisensory stimulation; neuro-architecture; stress reduction; waiting room design |
| Index terms: | designer, implementation, virtual reality, manager, satisfaction, in-situ, experiment |
| Subjects: | building construction, data collection methods, virtual reality, practitioner, profession, project delivery, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here