Jellema, P; Annemans, M and Heylighen, A (2020) The roles of cancer care facilities in users' well-being. Building Research & Information, 48(3), pp. 254-268. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The experience of cancer patients often includes numerous consultations and procedures taking place in a variety of (cancer) care facilities. Relatives and care professionals play a part and have unique perspectives. This article describes the roles cancer care facilities play in the well-being of patients, relatives, and care professionals, and identifies spatial aspects contributing to these roles. The study draws on qualitative interviews with 15 participants (five patients receiving cancer treatment in four hospitals, five relatives, and five care professionals). Interviews with patients were complemented with photovoice and walking interviews. Cancer care facilities turn out to play a vital role by containing and mediating the confrontation with cancer. This requires attention for boundaries, routes, and transitions. Moreover, cancer care facilities can support coping by offering experiences of efficiency and normality, and opportunities to distance oneself from features typical of hospitals. The facilities are constantly changing, and the people they receive are also dealing with changing bodies. Attention should be paid to the sensory qualities and atmosphere at points of entrance. All users would benefit from improved spatial organization, 'homelike' qualities in designated spaces, and increased awareness of options to use spaces flexibly while ensuring a sense of spatial stability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cancer; healthcare environment; hospital design; patient experience; photovoice; qualitative research |
| Index terms: | coping, option, efficiency, qualitative research, well-being, boundaries, interview, stability |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, property law, performance management, structural engineering, behavioral psychology, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here