Reintegrating ex-offenders into work through construction: A case study of cross-sector collaboration in social procurement

Loosemore, M; Bridgeman, J and Keast, R (2020) Reintegrating ex-offenders into work through construction: A case study of cross-sector collaboration in social procurement. Building Research & Information, 48(7), pp. 731-746. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Too many ex-offenders are condemned to a life of unemployment, under-employment and benefit-dependency with significant ongoing costs to themselves, the economy and to wider society. To address this growing and intransigent problem, recent public policy innovations have led to the re-emergence of collaborative instruments such as social procurement which require companies tendering for construction and infrastructure contracts to train and employ ex-offenders on their projects. To comply, construction firms need to form new collaborate arrangements with organizations from the social and government sectors, yet little is known about how these new cross-sector collaborations work, what barriers to collaboration exist and how to overcome them. Mobilising theories of cross-sector collaboration, this exploratory case study research draws on findings from interviews, observations and documentary analysis of eleven collaborative pilot projects in the UK designed to explore new employment pathways for ex-offenders into construction. The findings reveal numerous barriers to cross-sector collaboration including little experience of cross-sector working; challenges working across different organizational logics; transaction costs associated with new organizational practices; and misaligned incentives. It is concluded that new forms of social project management, intrapreneurship and relational competencies need to be developed to enable these new collaborative arrangements to work.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; construction; ex-offenders; social procurement; social value
Index terms: case study, employment, social value, project management, transaction cost, society, interview, construction firm, collaboration, emergence, documentary analysis, unemployment, public policy
Subjects: project management theory and practice, management, communities and social development, systems engineering, financial analysis, sociology, data collection methods, organization, data science, economic analysis, public policy
Topics: Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here