Pardalis, G; Mahapatra, K and Mainali, B (2020) Swedish construction MSEs: Simply renovators or renovation service innovators? Building Research & Information, 48(1), pp. 67-83. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
To address the renovation needs of detached house stock in Sweden, micro and small-sized enterprises (MSEs), a subgroup of small and medium-sized enterprises, are expected to introduce more comprehensive house renovation solutions. One-stop-shop (OSS) is an innovative Product-Service System model that can enable MSEs to offer comprehensive renovation packages instead of existing fragmented solutions. We have applied a conceptual framework for innovation adoption in organizations and conducted an interview of 21 construction MSEs in three different geographical areas in Sweden to examine their perceptions and preparedness to adopt the OSS business concept. Findings showed that the examined MSEs are positive towards OSS as it could address the needs for the comprehensive renovation of detached houses. However, presently, are not prepared to take the coordinator’s role in such a concept mainly due to the perceived business risks, the lack of flexibility to organizational restructuring, and lack of resources and management competency to coordinate multiple tasks and actors. Those organizations lacked awareness of existing policy support and access to funding mechanisms to try new business models. As a solution, they proposed an external coordinator to be the provider of OSS, on the trial phase, whose role and characteristics need to be further examined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business model; construction mses; detached houses; innovation adoption; one-stop-shop; organizational innovation |
| Index terms: | funding, renovation, business model, innovation adoption, package, subgroup, Sweden, conceptual framework, organizational innovation, interview |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, contractual arrangements, business, data collection methods, innovation studies, research management, theoretical framing, renovation and retrofit, Geography |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here