Housing managers as middle actors implementing sustainable housing policies in Finland

Peltomaa, J; Mela, H and Hildén, M (2020) Housing managers as middle actors implementing sustainable housing policies in Finland. Building Research & Information, 48(1), pp. 53-66. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Implementing policies for sustainability transitions calls for actors that translate policy aims into practical solutions. This is particularly important in cases where policies require the application of new technologies. An example of such a policy is the requirement to install apartment-level water meters with the purpose of enabling fair invoicing and the saving of water. Economic incentives are expected to fulfil the objectives. In Finland, professional housing managers provide expert services that are crucial for implementing the policy requirements on metering in buildings. In this, they become middle actors between policy, technology, residents and their practices. In this study, the role of housing managers and their relationship to the different rationales that are used to justify decisions on apartment-level water metering is explored. The study shows that, although housing managers emphasize economic aspects, they also recognize technological and equity aspects. This raises questions of how middle actors should be considered in developing policies for sustainable housing. The results suggest that progress could be made by recognizing them in policy development and by raising their awareness as true intermediaries in advancing wider sustainability goals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building management; housing managers; intermediaries; policy implementation; smart meters; sustainable buildings
Index terms: new technology, Finland, intermediary, sustainable housing, manager, building management, smart meter, economic incentive, policy implementation, sustainable building, housing
Subjects: Geography, sustainable construction, management, housing and residential development, practitioner, construction type, policy studies, business, innovation and technology management, energy systems, economic analysis
Topics: Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here