Data-driven occupant actions prediction to achieve an intelligent building

Pereira, P F; Ramos, N M M and Simões, M L (2020) Data-driven occupant actions prediction to achieve an intelligent building. Building Research & Information, 48(5), pp. 485-500. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

An intelligent building has to know the specificities of the occupants and determine their drivers to perform actions so that it can optimize the building operation. Five windows of different rooms of the same dwelling were analysed in-depth to understand the specificities and variations of occupants' behaviour. Logistic regressions were used as a machine learning method to predict occupants' actions. The windows opening prediction models were formulated by taking into account continuous and categorical variables. An evaluation of the required data length that allows obtaining the prediction models with results identical to those obtained with the complete year was performed. It was concluded that the best option was to use at least 15 days in summer and 15 days in winter to have a reliable prediction for the full year. The model constructed for each window did not show good prediction success when applied in another room of the same dwelling. This study shows that the specificity of humans needs do not allow a generalization of their behaviours in the built environment. Thus, it is necessary to adapt the algorithms of the building automation systems through data-driven machine learning techniques.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: data mining; environmental monitoring; intelligent buildings; logistic regressions; machine learning; occupant behaviour
Index terms: built environment, summer, occupant behaviour, option, logistic regression, data mining, environmental monitoring, variation, window, building operation, machine learning, building automation, winter, prediction model, intelligent building
Subjects: environmental impact, health behaviours and lifestyles, climate science, data science, artificial intelligence, prediction and forecasting, design practice, architectural elements, management, contractual condition, automation and robotics, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis
Topics: Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here