Wang, Y; Xue, X; Yu, T and Wang, Y (2021) Mapping the dynamics of China's prefabricated building policies from 1956 to 2019: A bibliometric analysis. Building Research & Information, 49(2), pp. 216-233. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Compared to buildings constructed in situ, prefabricated buildings (PBs) offer many environmental benefits in terms of carbon emissions, energy consumption, material consumption, and waste generation. To mitigate adverse impacts by the building sector on the environment, PBs have been widely applied in many countries. Although PB policies (PBPs) have played a significant role in guiding, supporting, and promulgating China’s PB development, few studies have systematically investigated these PBPs. As a result, the evolution of PBPs in China is not clear, which limits practitioners' overall understanding of PBPs. To bridge this knowledge gap, a bibliometric analysis method was employed to review 136 PBPs issued in China from 1956 to 2019. Through text mining, a co-word network analysis, and a collaboration network analysis, we mapped, visualized, and described the PBP system over time. The evolution of PBPs can be divided into four phases: exploration (1956–1995), fluctuation (1996–2005), steady improvement (2006–2015), and rapid growth (2016–2019). Our findings indicate that the PB policy targets, policy objects, policy tools, performance indicators, and the collaboration structure of policymaking agencies have changed significantly across these phases. Lastly, the PB experience in China was compared with those of countries exhibiting higher levels of PB development, which can serve as a reference for PB development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; co-word network analysis; collaboration network analysis; policy system; prefabricated building |
| Index terms: | China, agency, consumption, practitioner, exploration, mapping, evolution, collaboration, bibliometric analysis, performance indicator, policy tools, prefabricated building, in-situ, mining, energy consumption, dynamics, waste generation, carbon emission, network analysis |
| Subjects: | Geography, management, spatial and geospatial analysis, performance management, systems engineering, research evaluation and metrics, building construction, geotechnical engineering, sociology, environmental impact, consumer economics, climate science, practitioner, policy studies, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, energy systems, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here