Xie, X; Qin, S; Gou, Z and Yi, M (2020) Engaging professionals in urban stormwater management: The case of China's Sponge City. Building Research & Information, 48(7), pp. 719-730. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The initiative of Sponge City has been launched in China to manage stormwater in cities. This study aims to understand the motivation of professionals in advocating for sponge cities and their opinions on implementing sponge measures. This study surveyed 443 water and planning professionals who have been involved in sponge cities in South China, which is an area that is located in the subtropical climate zone with abundant rainfall and serious urban stormwater issues. A 'crisis-action' model that was established in this study revealed that professionals' crisis awareness on urban flooding, water pollution and water scarcity would make them feel responsible for water protection, recycling and conservation, and the recognition of sponge cities as the advantageous solution would trigger their advocacy for the related policy. The professionals' opinions on the feasibility of the sponge measures that have been proposed at the national level pointed to complex factors such as precipitation, urban density and cost-effectiveness in implementing Sponge City at the local level. This study also found some demographic differences in the responsibility and support for the Sponge City initiative. The results call for a more collaborative work platform for engaging various professionals in urban stormwater management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; policy implementation; sponge city; stormwater; urban resilience; water management |
| Index terms: | recycling, pollution, platform, water management, conservation, urban density, South China, motivation, flooding, rainfall, cost-effectivenes, precipitation, China, urban resilience, stormwater, policy implementation |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, environmental policy, psychology, environmental resource management, sustainability and resilience, waste management, climate science, policy studies, environmental hazards, environmental health, environmental engineering, Geography, digital design, physical geography and landforms, economics |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here