Ade, R and Rehm, M (2021) Summertime comparative evaluation of indoor temperature and comfort in auckland New Zealand: A survey of green certified, code and older homes. Building Research & Information, 49(3), pp. 336-351. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A frequently stated hallmark of certified green homes is that they are 'healthier' and provide superior thermal comfort. This usually requires increasing insulation levels from code requirements on the understanding that this will provide a warmer, drier internal environment. However this solution to 'cold and damp' housing may have unintended consequences; while highly insulated dwellings may be warm over the winter, are they still comfortable during warmest months? This study analyses 29 dwellings in Auckland, New Zealand to determine if there is any difference in the temperature and thermal comfort between three types of dwellings: newly built green certified (6-Homestar), newly built non-certified and old dwellings (pre-1978). The results show large differences between dwelling categories with the certified 6-Homestar dwellings exceeding the World Health Organisation (WHO) healthy temperature threshold 75% of the time during the warmest months of the year, resulting in predicted occupant discomfort 16% of the time. These results have significant policy implications with it apparent that not only under-heating but also overheating require specific attention in government legislation, green building rating tools and building codes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green buildings; homestar; overheating; sustainable buildings; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | thermal comfort, policy implication, housing, winter, insulation, unintended consequence, building code, New Zealand, legislation, indoor temperature, overheating, survey, comfort, discomfort, sustainable building, green building |
| Subjects: | environmental science, building materials, sustainable construction, risk assessment, legal systems, occupational health and safety management, design practice, regulatory law, climate science, health risk and incident analysis, environmental engineering, construction type, Geography, policy studies, data collection methods, thermal systems |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Governance, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Sustainability, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here