Higher education students' indoor environmental quality satisfaction benchmark

Bae, S; Martin, C S and Asojo, A O (2021) Higher education students' indoor environmental quality satisfaction benchmark. Building Research & Information, 49(6), pp. 679-694. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Post-occupancy evaluation is a well-known research method documenting occupants' satisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors. Despite potentially significant roles of gender differences in IEQ satisfaction, it has not always been acknowledged by researchers and findings are debated. Through a self-administered questionnaire over nine years, students (n = 3140) in 11 different higher education classroom buildings in Minnesota, USA rated their satisfaction with 23 IEQ factors. They were most satisfied with overall cleaning and maintenance followed by overall indoor air quality and amount of electric lighting. Students were least satisfied with access to electric outlets followed by daylighting IEQ factors. Mann–Whitney U tests showed that female students were statistically less satisfied with overall thermal conditions and temperature, while male students were statistically less satisfied with daylighting, electric lighting, and view conditions. Subsequent logistic regression analyses indicated the most significant impact of amount of electric lighting. The results imply that once students were dissatisfied with amount of electric lighting, they were more likely to be dissatisfied with the classroom. Despite the significant impacts of all IEQ factors, the different degree of the likelihoods indicates that some IEQ factors may impact classroom satisfaction more than other IEQ factors as indicated by this benchmark study.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benchmark; classroom; gender differences; indoor environmental quality; post-occupancy evaluation; students
Index terms: satisfaction, higher education, post-occupancy evaluation, indoor environmental quality, logistic regression analysis, cleaning, daylighting, questionnaire, indoor air quality, classroom
Subjects: maintenance engineering, environmental health, statistical analysis, building performance, educational institutions, data collection methods, construction type, project delivery, evaluation methods
Topics: Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Education, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here