Bae, S; Martin, C S and Asojo, A O (2021) Indoor environmental quality factors that matter to workplace occupants: An 11-year-benchmark study. Building Research & Information, 49(4), pp. 445-459. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Post-occupancy evaluations (POE) have been often used to study user satisfaction with office environments. More recently, POEs have been recognized for documenting occupant well-being and responses to 26 indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors that incorporate sustainable design guidelines such as thermal, lighting, and acoustic conditions. The Sustainable Post-Occupancy Evaluation Surveys (SPOES) have measured occupants' (n =2836) satisfaction with IEQ factors for 11 years. This paper presents findings from this 11-year-benchmark study. It suggests a lower satisfaction rating for adjustability than other IEQ factors. Based on further logistic regression analyses of the IEQ factors, occupants tended to be dissatisfied with their primary workspace when they were dissatisfied with acoustic conditions, furnishings, and privacy. The results imply that improving acoustic and privacy conditions, especially, would bring the most significant impact on the positive experience in built environments, whereas improving thermal conditions would impact relatively less significant on the positive experience. Acknowledging how differently each IEQ factor can affect building occupants' satisfaction and perception is important for determining benchmarks that support occupants' health and well-being in the workplace environment, where they spend much of their time.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmark; indoor environmental quality; post-occupancy evaluation; satisfaction; workplace |
| Index terms: | built environment, indoor environmental quality, logistic regression analysis, post-occupancy evaluation, workspace, satisfaction, privacy, well-being, workplace environment, satisfaction rating, user satisfaction, survey, health and wellbeing, sustainable design |
| Subjects: | design process, management, infrastructure and transport systems, professional ethics, statistical analysis, environmental health, sociology, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, client relations, evaluation methods, project delivery |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here