Particle dispersion in a cleanroom–effects of pressurization, door opening and traffic flow

Bhattacharya, A; Metcalf, A R; Nafchi, A M and Mousavi, E S (2021) Particle dispersion in a cleanroom–effects of pressurization, door opening and traffic flow. Building Research & Information, 49(3), pp. 294-307. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Air cleanliness is of particular importance in clean environments, as a small source of contamination can highly disturb the true function of space. One common-place approach is to establish a positive pressure relative to adjacent areas that would avoid unwanted airborne particles. However, door operation and the movement of traffic may result in air mixing across the cleanroom door. This paper presents the results of a series of experiments to characterize the effect of pressure difference, traffic flow and door opening on cross-contamination and air quality inside the cleanroom. The experiments were conducted in an actual cleanroom where an oil-based substance was aerosolized in neighbouring areas, and its path inside the cleanroom was studied. Results suggested that the higher-pressure differentials were more effective to prevent aerosols to enter the cleanroom. Door operation can eliminate, and even reverse the pressurization across the door. Under a higher-pressure difference, however, it took a much shorter time for positive pressure to recover. The results of this work will be useful in determining the optimal settings of cleanroom operation, where the probabilities of contamination from an outside source are minimized.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: air quality; cleanroom; cross-contamination; door opening; positive pressure
Index terms: traffic flow, air quality, contamination, movement, experiment
Subjects: climate science, data collection methods, environmental health, transportation engineering, health behaviours and lifestyles
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 CE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here