An empirical study of information flows in multidisciplinary civil engineering design teams using lean measures

Tribelsky, E and Sacks, R (2011) An empirical study of information flows in multidisciplinary civil engineering design teams using lean measures. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(2), pp. 85-101. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Achieving smooth and continual flow of information among teams of independent designers is one of the central difficulties in detailed design of complex civil engineering projects. Lean production flow phenomena such as bottlenecks, rework, large batches and long cycle times are common. This research sought correlation between the degree of success achieved, in terms of design document effectiveness, meeting budget and schedule targets, and participant satisfaction, on the one hand, and the occurrence of information flow problems, on the other. Extensive data describing the communication of design documents between team members were collected in the detailed design phase of 14 civil engineering projects, all of which were part of a major airport construction project. The degree of effectiveness of the design documents, the extent to which budget and schedule targets were met, and participants' evaluations of their success were measured. The results confirm positive correlation between the quality of information flows and the effectiveness of design documents, and confirm that unstable information flows are associated with unpredictable project outcomes. No correlation was found between information flow problems and design managers' subjective views of the processes, nor between their performance evaluations and their fulfilment of budget or schedule targets.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: civil engineering; design management; information flow; lean construction
Index terms: satisfaction, lean construction, design manager, designer, project outcome, information flow, lean production, rework, design phase, documents, effectiveness, design management, empirical study, engineering design, performance evaluation, airport construction
Subjects: information systems, building construction, design process, infrastructure engineering, professional development, performance management, research methods, performance measurement, manufacturing engineering, project delivery, professional practice, operations management, project completion, profession
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here