Gilani, S and O’Brien, W (2021) Natural ventilation usability under climate change in Canada and the United States. Building Research & Information, 49(4), pp. 367-386. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Natural ventilation can be incorporated into buildings to decrease energy use and the associated greenhouse gas emissions of buildings. However, mechanical cooling has largely replaced natural ventilation in commercial buildings in Canada and the US. This study evaluates the potential for natural ventilation under climate change. To this end, a typical office space in a mixed-mode building in 14 cities representing the major climate zones in Canada and the US was simulated to assess the usability of natural ventilation under the predicted climatic data for the years 2050 and 2080. A rule-based model for change-over between natural and mechanical ventilation modes was developed on the basis of the adaptive thermal comfort model. The potential impact of occupants was also simulated using an existing stochastic occupants' window use model. The simulation results show that the natural ventilation usability with rule-based control generally decreases under climate change. The stochastic model indicated the risk of overheating resulted from inefficient window use. Climate change leads to higher cooling energy use, which can be reduced considerably, especially in temperate climates, using natural ventilation with rule-based control. However, the stochastic model yielded to the reduction in the energy saving rates.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive thermal comfort model; building performance simulation; mixed-mode building; rule-based model; stochastic occupant model |
| Index terms: | climate change, overheating, natural ventilation, energy-saving, energy use, office space, window, thermal comfort, United States, greenhouse gas emission, Canada, building performance simulation, usability, commercial building, mechanical ventilation |
| Subjects: | climate science, thermal systems, modelling and simulation, environmental health, energy systems, architectural elements, construction type, user-centered design, Geography, environmental engineering |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here