Naik, N S; Elzeyadi, I; Minson, C T and Lee, J H (2021) Thermal pleasure inside solar screened spaces: An experimental study to explore alliesthesia in architecture. Building Research & Information, 49(7), pp. 795-812. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Controlled non-uniform indoor thermal environments have the potential to evoke thermal pleasure in occupants as explained by the psychophysiological framework of alliesthesia. In this study, the authors aimed to explore thermal pleasure inside solar screen shaded, single-occupancy, perimeter office set-ups that are within a 4.5 m distance from a building facade. Two solar screens, static (stationary) and dynamic (movable), were designed to differently control the thermal environments inside the single-occupancy, perimeter office set-ups. A within-subject experiment was designed in which 27 human participants were exposed to both set-ups. Subjective responses on thermal pleasure as well as objective data including the participants' physiological responses and indoor environmental data were collected during these exposures. Correlations between the subjective responses and objective data were analysed. Ramps in operative temperatures and skin temperature contrasts were found to have a significant influence (p < 0.05) on evoking thermal pleasure in ambient thermal environments of the solar-screened, perimeter offices that remained in the upper fringes of the thermoneutrality limits. The findings provide experimental evidence that expands the application of the thermal alliesthesia framework to building perimeter offices. This work contributes to occupant-centric building research by describing an approach to design shading systems that cater to occupant’s thermal pleasure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alliesthesia; perimeter offices; solar screens; thermal pleasure |
| Index terms: | thermal environment, exposure, experiment, building research, evidence, skin temperature, thermal pleasure, shading, operative |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, building design, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, environmental engineering, data collection methods, research management, building performance |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here