Building information modelling application of material, water, and climate footprint analysis

Sameer, H and Bringezu, S (2021) Building information modelling application of material, water, and climate footprint analysis. Building Research & Information, 49(6), pp. 593-612. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Buildings are considered major drivers of resource use and climate change. This has initiated the development of design tools that could better reflect the environmental performance of buildings. This article describes the extension of building information modelling (BIM) through the development of the sustainable resource application (SURAP) that can be used to determine the material, water, and climate footprints of buildings at the design stage. The Python application programming interface (API) of openLCA software was used with the GaBi construction materials database for the preparation of footprint data. Footprints of construction materials were determined through life cycle assessments (LCA) on a cradle-to-gate basis, and the application was developed as a new tab in the Autodesk Revit software. The Revit API was used for data exchange between the Revit core system and the developed plug-in. The application prototype was tested for the design of a multifamily building. The results show that the developed tool can support building designers in quantifying and visualizing cradle-to-gate material, water, and the climate footprints of buildings within the BIM environment. The promotion of sustainability in the building industry and its current limitations are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural design; life cycle assessment; material footprint; resource efficiency; sustainability
Index terms: prototype, footprint analysis, life cycle assessment, architectural design, climate change, programming, design stage, database, designer, promotion, data exchange, environmental performance, building information modelling, building industry, resource efficiency, construction material
Subjects: programming, environmental impact, climate science, profession, professional practice, modelling and simulation, building materials, sustainability assessment, management, design practice, data exchange, industry analysis, information systems, data management
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here