A proposed long-term thermal comfort scale

Sharifi, S; Saman, W; Alemu, A and Boland, J (2021) A proposed long-term thermal comfort scale. Building Research & Information, 49(6), pp. 661-678. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This study proposes a novel 10-point numerical scale to evaluate long-term thermal comfort satisfaction. The available scale that verbally evaluates the short-term thermal comfort is thermal sensation vote (TSV) and this has substituted for the long-term thermal comfort assessment. However, the TSV has been questioned by many studies due to the ambiguous, widely different interpretation of each score and unequal perceived gaps between the scores. The paper argues the biological similarities between pain and temperature perceptions and proposes a numerical thermal comfort scale like that of long-term pain perception. Participants in a survey rated their long-term summer thermal comfort in the natural ventilation mode through the numerical and TSV scales. Ratings were compared after converting to degree hours based on monitoring temperature data for the same summer. The results show that the numerical scale provides an opportunity for respondents to express their long-term thermal comfort satisfaction level. Scoring by the numerical scale was convenient and clear to the respondents. The verbal scores of TSV, had different interpretations for individuals as each point was attributed to more than two values of degree hours. The score 'Neutral' was significantly ambiguous for assessing thermal comfort.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive thermal comfort; comfort rating; degree hours; energy-efficient building; running mean outdoor temperature; thermal comfort evaluation
Index terms: temperature perception, natural ventilation, survey, energy-efficient building, monitoring, summer, comfort, thermal comfort, thermal sensation, pain, satisfaction
Subjects: environmental engineering, health conditions and diseases, building performance, occupational health and safety management, sustainable design, project delivery, control systems, climate science, data collection methods
Topics: Site Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here