Detection of defects in building walls using modified optd method for down-sampling of point clouds

Suchocki, C; Błaszczak-Bąk, W; Janicka, J and Dumalski, A (2021) Detection of defects in building walls using modified optd method for down-sampling of point clouds. Building Research & Information, 49(2), pp. 197-215. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanning is a simple and nondestructive method for the high-accuracy, three-dimensional mapping of buildings and structures. It yields a high-resolution point cloud, allowing for comprehensive and reliable diagnosis of the target building. However, there are difficulties in processing such large datasets. Commercial software typically reduces the datasets using random methods, resulting in the loss of useful information. Herein, we propose a modified optimum dataset (OptD) method for performing diagnostic measurements on buildings. The modified OptD method allows the retention of more points corresponding to areas of interest, such as those with cracks, cavities, and other surface imperfections, and removal of redundant information related to flat and homogeneous surface walls. We propose two approaches for reducing the size of the datasets while simultaneously detecting the imperfections in building walls. The first is to down-sample the datasets in the OXYZ coordinate system to improve the detection of defects corresponding to geometric changes (e.g. cracks and cavities). The second is to down-sample the datasets in the OXYI coordinate system (where I is the laser intensity) to improve the detection accuracy for defects corresponding to changes in the physicochemical properties of the surface (e.g. moisture content, weathering, salt blooming, and biodeterioration).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: defect detection; down-sampling; high-resolution scanning; optimum dataset method; terrestrial laser scanning
Index terms: mapping, sampling, moisture content, retention, accuracy, resolution, laser scanning, dataset, point cloud
Subjects: data management, professional development, spatial and geospatial analysis, conflict resolution, data collection methods, material properties and characteristics, management, analytical methods, digital design
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here