Sudprasert, S (2021) Utilization of an evaporative air cooler to achieve thermal comfort in Thailand. Building Research & Information, 49(3), pp. 325-335. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Evaporative air coolers are widely accepted for outdoor use in the tropical climates of Thailand. However, their contribution to achieving indoor thermal comfort is still undetermined. The purposes of this study are to determine the thermal comfort level achieved by evaporative air coolers and identify variables affecting thermal comfort when using an evaporative air cooler indoors in the tropical climate of Thailand. The results of a questionnaire that asked subjects about thermal comfort when exposed to evaporative cooled air were compared with the results of participants exposed to natural air. A multiple regression model identified variables affecting thermal comfort. This research successfully determined the thermal comfort level achieved by evaporative air coolers of −0.6 (slightly cool) on the thermal sensation scale, which is lower than the level of 0.0 (neutral feeling) achieved by fans. The recommendation is that evaporative air coolers with a high velocity of 1.4 m/s be used indoors to avoid discomfort from the too damp air. The results of the regression analysis demonstrate that air temperature and velocity are the two most influential variables affecting thermal sensation in the application of evaporative air cooling in Thailand.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | moisture transfer; natural ventilation; occupant surveys; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | multiple regression model, thermal sensation, discomfort, Thailand, thermal comfort, air temperature, regression analysis, occupant survey, natural ventilation, questionnaire, moisture transfer |
| Subjects: | environmental engineering, thermal systems, statistical analysis, health risk and incident analysis, Geography, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Health and Safety, Construction Materials, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here