Van Linden, S and Van Den Bossche, N (2021) Comparative study on the feasibility of watertight face-sealed building joints under simulated wind-driven rain conditions. Building Research & Information, 49(7), pp. 748-762. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Although several field studies have indicated that water penetration can be expected through face-sealed joints over the lifespan of buildings, in particular, when sealed by means of construction sealant, face-sealed systems are still being applied by industry, e.g. precast concrete panels. Laboratory studies evaluating the concept of face-sealed joints are, however, limited. This study assesses and compares the initial performance of four sealing systems, tapes, silicone strips, silicone-based coating and foam sealing strips, applied to seal building joints in a face-sealed manner and subjected to simulated wind pressures and driving rain loads. The results give insight into the initial watertightness of the sealing materials and the sensitivity of the performance of the materials to different installation methods. The results indicate that water leakage can be expected through unperceivable openings in the face-sealed joints and that great care should be taken to install the sealing materials in the correct manner. The findings also suggest that closed-cell foam strips might be considered as an alternative to construction sealant to face-seal joints. Further research should evaluate the performance of these foam sealing strips after natural weathering and exposure to cyclic building movements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building joints; face-sealed; sealing methods; watertightness |
| Index terms: | laboratory, field study, movement, lifespan, face, coating, exposure, wind pressure, driving rain, comparative study, precast concrete, penetration, wind-driven rain |
| Subjects: | market analysis, research management, structural engineering, public and environmental health, research methods, environmental science, material degradation and durability, psychology, building materials, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here