Acharya, P; Sharma, K; Pokharel, G R and Adhikari, R (2022) Reviewing the progress of reconstruction five years after the 2015 gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Building Research & Information, 50(6), pp. 595-609. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
An earthquake of moment magnitude (M w) 7.8, the largest in the last 80 years, struck central Nepal on April 25, 2015. Named the Gorkha earthquake, it wreaked havoc on the country’s central region, affecting 32 of 77 districts. The earthquake impacted nearly a million private houses, thousands of educational infrastructures, hundreds of health facilities, myriad cultural heritages and many other infrastructures. The National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) was established to lead the post-earthquake recovery and reconstruction and complete it within five years. This paper presents details of the earthquake’s effects, the early response and the status of the post-earthquake reconstruction progress five years after the earthquake. Official reports from Nepalese government institutions, national and international authorities, government databases and research papers on the Gorkha earthquake were reviewed. The numbers of various infrastructures reconstructed and under construction each year after the earthquake and the reconstruction processes adopted are presented. The results show that 67% of private houses, 74% of educational institutions and 58% of health facilities were reconstructed in the five years.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster; disaster recovery; gorkha earthquake; housing; infrastructure; reconstruction |
| Index terms: | database, recovery, disaster recovery, reconstruction, health facility, Nepal, earthquake, housing, research paper |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, data management, building construction, Geography, construction type, emergency and crisis management, operations management, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Project Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Information Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here