A summertime thermal analysis of New Zealand homestar certified apartments for older people

Ade, R and Rehm, M (2022) A summertime thermal analysis of New Zealand homestar certified apartments for older people. Building Research & Information, 50(6), pp. 681-693. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

It is recognized that as humans age, their ability to withstand high or low temperatures reduces. Temperature extremes can also worsen chronic conditions, including cardiovascular, respiratory and other health issues. This study analyses 40 apartments in a single building in Auckland, New Zealand to determine whether the newly designed and constructed apartment, specifically for retirees, is delivering a suitable thermal interior environment during the warmest months of the year. Despite holding this green certification and meeting specific requirements to achieve cooling points that are meant to reduce the likelihood of overheating, the building exhibits significant signs of overheating in the two warmest months of the year (January and February) with two-thirds of apartments failing the CIBSE TM59 overheating criteria. The summertime performance of this green-rated building crucial insights for design professionals policymakers and developers of green building rating tools.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: green buildings; green design; indoor environment quality; temperature
Index terms: green building, older people, green certification, overheating, low temperature, thermal analysis, New Zealand, indoor environment
Subjects: environmental science, design practice, sustainability assessment, Geography, demography, environmental engineering, thermal systems
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Sustainability, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here