Critical policy drivers for modular integrated construction projects in Hong Kong

Jin, X; Ekanayake, E M A C and Shen, G Q P (2022) Critical policy drivers for modular integrated construction projects in Hong Kong. Building Research & Information, 50(4), pp. 467-484. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Given the increased importance of identifying the critical Policy Driving Forces (PDFs) to uptake Modular integrated Construction (MiC) practices in Hong Kong (HK), this study aims to identify and examine the critical PDFs associated with MiC projects in HK from the perspective of industry experts. After drawing on the plentiful relevant literature and conducting a pilot study, an expert opinion survey was conducted to gather the necessary data for this study. The collected data were analysed using relevant significance analysis and factor analysis to identify critical PDFs and appropriate groupings. The results revealed 23 critical PDFs under seven critical components in three stages of the MiC process. Regulative PDFs show the highest criticality for up-taking the MiC in the initiation and planning and design phases, while Greater Bay Area development PDFs are critical in the construction phase. The PDF related to the COVID-19 pandemic is the only critical PDF that appeared in all three stages. As the first study that explores PDFs for MiC uptake throughout all project phases, this study contributes substantially to theory and practice while better informing policymakers on how to initiate MiC-related policies to boost MiC practice in HK, where MiC is achieving greater prominence in application.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Greater Bay Area; Hong Kong; modular integrated construction; policy; policy driving forces
Index terms: construction project, survey, drawing, COVID-19, construction phase, design phase, factor analysis, Hong Kong, pandemic
Subjects: Geography, production management, health risk and incident analysis, statistical analysis, data collection methods, professional practice, project delivery, technical documentation
Topics: Design Practice, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here