Manahasa, O and Manahasa, E (2022) Trained and untrained children explore school spaces in Albania: Assessment and participation in children's well-being. Building Research & Information, 50(8), pp. 827-844. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This study focuses on evaluating school spaces with children’s participation, aiming to learn its impact on children’s well-being and their involvement in school design. The study uses data from a visual and a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) questionnaire, conducted with randomly selected (N = 92) untrained children (age 10–14) and another group (N = 25) trained earlier in several participatory workshops. The first questionnaire asks both groups to evaluate international examples of innovative school buildings. The second is a POE of the involved children’s school building. The primary objective is to examine the evaluation of both groups and their preferences about school spaces. The questionnaires showed that children focus on specific school spaces, whereas visuals encourage them to think holistically. Girls and younger children from both groups are more expressive, meanwhile all trained children exhibit positive social interaction. When evaluating their school, trained children’s fairness is significantly higher than the untrained group. Insights collected help drive change in school management and design. The study suggests using both a visual questionnaire and POE with trained and untrained children as complementary tools to provide a comprehensive and reliable method to collect information about school design. Systematic involvement of children positively affects their well-being.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | children; participatory methods; school building; well-being |
| Index terms: | fairness, social interaction, girl, workshop, Albania, children, post-occupancy evaluation, questionnaire, school building, well-being, preference |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, Geography, demography, sociology, leadership, data collection methods, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, evaluation methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here