Porto Valente, C; Morris, A and Wilkinson, S J (2022) Energy poverty, housing and health: The lived experience of older low-income australians. Building Research & Information, 50(1-2), pp. 6-18. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Energy poverty (EP) is the product of three main factors – the cost of energy, household income and the energy efficiency of the dwelling. Climate change and rising energy costs are likely to accentuate EP. This study extends our knowledge about EP in Australia and examines its relationship to housing and health. Drawing on 23 semi-structured interviews, we map the impacts of EP on older low-income people residing in Sydney and Melbourne. These impacts include food insecurity, an incapacity to purchase essential consumer items, an inability to afford required medical procedures, thermal discomfort and social exclusion. We found that many interviewees do not recognize their own EP situation or are too ashamed to ask for help. Thus, the overall cost of EP to individuals and the broader society can be far higher than what statistics indicate. The article proposes a conceptualization of the relationship between housing, health and EP drawing on a figure we have created. The severe impacts of EP suggest that measures to lessen it among older vulnerable households are urgently required.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy poverty; housing conditions; mental and physical health; older people; social isolation |
| Index terms: | statistics, household, income, discomfort, Australia, poverty, energy efficiency, housing, climate change, older people, drawing, society, energy cost, interview |
| Subjects: | health risk and incident analysis, Geography, sociology, demography, cost management, communities and social development, mathematical modelling, construction type, data collection methods, climate science, sustainability and energy, technical documentation, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Ethics, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here