Ruge, J; Dimitrova, V; Grubbauer, M and Bögle, A (2022) Models, mock-ups and materials: Artefacts of collaboration in the planning of large-scale construction projects. Building Research & Information, 50(8), pp. 881-893. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper explores the dynamic nature of collaborations in construction projects by analysing the artefacts built environment professionals develop, use and transform over the project course. The authors introduce the concept of 'artefacts of collaboration' that systematizes different artefacts types, to provide insights into how collaborations emerge and unfold across distinct disciplines and different project stages. Empirically, the concept is derived from 35 in-depth interviews with professionals involved in four large-scale construction projects. Theoretically, the concept is based on a pluralistic approach combining productively the concepts of boundary and epistemic objects to address better the specificities of collaborations in construction projects. More specifically, the concept of artefacts of collaboration allows exploring how collaborations transform across the 'design-construction' divide that largely defines the interactions and relationships between built environment professionals. Hereby, through the analysis of artefacts of collaboration the paper reveals different modes of collaboration and how the roles and responsibilities of project partners change through these modes of collaboration.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artefacts; collaboration; construction projects; design-construction divide; pluralistic approach |
| Index terms: | built environment, project partner, interaction, construction project, collaboration, artefact, interview |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, sociology, behavioral psychology, infrastructure and transport systems, management, production management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here