Pedestrian thermal perception: Studies around two high-rise buildings in the mediterranean climate

Saroglou, T; Itzhak-Ben-Shalom, H and Meir, I A (2022) Pedestrian thermal perception: Studies around two high-rise buildings in the mediterranean climate. Building Research & Information, 50(1-2), pp. 171-191. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

High-rise buildings affect the microclimate around them at ground level and, as a result, also affect the pedestrian activities that take place there. The implications of this statement are especially amplified by the increasing numbers of high-rise buildings within the urban environment. This paper focuses on the urban microclimate in the vicinity of two high-rise buildings, with a focus on urban thermal comfort and wind patterns at pedestrian level relative to building height. The studies take place in the Mediterranean climate of Tel Aviv. The methodology includes collecting and combining various data, e.g. microclimatic monitoring, spot measurements, meteorological stations data, and surveys performed by administering questionnaires. Results showed that enhanced wind velocity is perceived as positive in summer, but unpleasant in winter, for the specific climatic conditions. The case study emphasizes the importance of microclimatic studies as part of high-rise building design, and the inclusion of design guidelines at the pedestrian level of high-rise buildings. In this process, the evaluation of outdoor human comfort perception through field surveys is highlighted.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: high-rise design; mediterranean climate; pedestrian thermal comfort/perception; seasonal variations; urban design; wind climate
Index terms: building height, case study, climatic condition, seasonal variation, microclimate, monitoring, thermal comfort, summer, comfort, survey, winter, urban design, high-rise building, pedestrian, urban environment, thermal perception, methodology, questionnaire
Subjects: environmental engineering, occupational health and safety management, sociology, building performance, urban design, research methods, control systems, urban sustainability, climate science, construction type, data collection methods
Topics: Research Practice, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here