Sarran, L; Lex, S W and Wærsted, E H (2022) Comfort and technical installations in Danish low-energy homes: Reconnecting design intention and domestic perceptions. Building Research & Information, 50(3), pp. 308-324. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In order to reduce energy use and improve indoor environmental quality (IEQ), new and retrofitted dwellings are increasingly equipped with complex heating and mechanical ventilation solutions, which occupants have to learn to use and live with. This work investigates the different ways in which occupants integrate these technologies into daily domestic practices, the associated difficulties and their potential consequences on comfort and building performance. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with occupants of 37 new and retrofitted low-energy dwellings around Copenhagen (Denmark), focusing on occupants' domestication of underfloor heating and mechanical ventilation. While most respondents were largely satisfied with the IEQ in their homes, the interviews highlighted a disconnection between expected and real uses and perceptions of these technologies. The design assumptions were sometimes unable to reflect occupants' expectations, including regarding personal control needs. Moreover, installation and operational failures were frequent and difficult for users to diagnose and correct, as they lacked relatable technical guidance. Consequently, occupants often resorted to alternative ways of taking control, which could prove detrimental for energy use and IEQ. The findings highlight the need for incorporating interdisciplinary insights on in-use performance in the design and installation of building systems, making them more robust, reliable and transparent.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | comfort; domestication; energy efficiency; HVAC; occupant satisfaction; qualitative research |
| Index terms: | energy use, building system, occupant satisfaction, indoor environmental quality, comfort, personal control, energy efficiency, Denmark, domestication, qualitative research, building performance, mechanical ventilation, interview |
| Subjects: | environmental engineering, quality assurance, environmental health, behavioral psychology, communities and social development, occupational health and safety management, Geography, energy systems, sustainability and energy, engineering systems, user-centered design, research design and methodology, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here