Understanding the perceived productivity of office occupants in relation to workspace thermal environment

Soto Muñoz, J; Trebilcock Kelly, M; Flores-Alés, V and Ramírez-Vielma, R (2022) Understanding the perceived productivity of office occupants in relation to workspace thermal environment. Building Research & Information, 50(1-2), pp. 152-170. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This study examines the perceived productivity of office occupants in moderate thermal environments in Chile. Specifically, it analyses environmental parameters and contrasts participants' self-reported answers to cross-sectional and retrospective questionnaires. To this end, data were collected for one day in winter and one day in summer, in eighteen office buildings in the cities of Concepción and Santiago. The results show that the average operative temperatures are 22.2 °C in winter and 23.5 °C in summer. 80.5% of the occupants declared their productivity to be normal on the cross-sectional survey. However, on the retrospective survey, 82.7% said that their productivity is affected by the thermal environment. To reveal the interrelationships between perceived productivity and the thermal environment, a categorical principal components analysis was carried out. It demonstrated that there is only a relationship between cross-sectional and retrospective productivity in winter. Subsequently, a good-fitting structural equation model was created, which showed that different relationships exist between the variables. These findings could enable organizations and design professionals to better understand occupants' perceived productivity in relation to thermal conditions in office buildings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building evaluation; occupant perception; productivity; thermal perception
Index terms: workspace, productivity, office building, occupant perception, building evaluation, summer, structural equation model, Chile, thermal environment, operative, winter, survey, thermal perception, questionnaire, Santiago
Subjects: management, Geography, asset management, statistical analysis, environmental engineering, construction type, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, climate science
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here