Wiegand, E and Ramage, M (2022) The impact of policy instruments on the first generation of tall wood buildings. Building Research & Information, 50(3), pp. 255-275. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In a context of environmental concern and limited urban land, the construction industry faces the challenge of providing solutions for the increasing urban population both efficiently and sustainably. Numerous innovations on engineered wood products for multistorey buildings arise as one of the most promising solutions. In this context, various policies have facilitated the development of Tall Wood Buildings (TWBs). Yet, few publications analyse these policies and their influence on specific projects. This research aims to examine the impact of Policy Instruments (PIs) on individual TWBs qualitatively. Data collection is based on documentary review and semi-structured interviews with policymakers and professionals involved in 37 projects across eight countries. This study reveals that numerous TWBs have been facilitated by policies, acting through diverse PIs applied combined or in isolation. Notably, while Regulatory Instruments allowed TWBs in the first place, Research and Development Tools supported their development and approval process. Often, Research and Development Tools subsidised demonstration projects through Economic Instruments, after competitions or applications (Voluntary Policy Tools). Moreover, many Information Tools (e.g. campaigns, technical assessments) complemented other PIs. Remarkably, while some TWBs have become legal and technological precedents, technical information resulting from their development has influenced proposed changes in building codes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | policies; policy instruments; research and development; tall wood buildings; timber construction |
| Index terms: | building code, policy instrument, publication, research and development, population, competition, timber construction, face, tall wood, interview, approval, land, construction industry, policy tools, technical information, wood, environmental concern, economic instruments |
| Subjects: | contractual role, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, policy studies, environmental issues, psychology, real estate economics, building materials, economic analysis, design practice, traditional and composite building materials, technology management, market analysis, demography, research management, industry analysis, regulatory law |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Governance, Sustainability, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here