Synchronization of water-energy consumption in residential and non-residential buildings during COVID-19

Cai, S and Gou, Z (2023) Synchronization of water-energy consumption in residential and non-residential buildings during COVID-19. Building Research & Information, 51(6), pp. 682-700. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

COVID-19 has made working from home (WFH) a widely prevalent mode of work, resulting in highly complex changes of energy and water consumption in buildings. To understand these changes, this study applies the concept of water-energy nexus (WEN) in the analysis of energy and water data in residential and non-residential buildings in Ontario, Canada, before and during the pandemic. The study found the overall energy and water consumption of buildings exhibited a decreasing trend, with the most significant change found in water consumption. Energy and water consumption increased in residential buildings but decreased in non-residential buildings; the changes in energy and water consumption were synchronized over the WFH period. This study also elucidated that changes were related to the demographic and job attributes. When dealing with the peak load of residential consumption with a high consumption benchmark, due consideration should be given to the stronger synchronization of the two types of resources to improve the resilience of residences to cope with the uncertainty of unexpected large-scale public health crisis. Applying WEN to building resource consumption during WFH for the first time, the findings shed light on the need to enhance integrated water and energy management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building sector; energy consumption; water consumption; water-energy nexus; working from home
Index terms: COVID-19, peak load, consumption, non-residential building, water consumption, residential building, pandemic, Canada, public health, energy consumption, resource consumption, energy management
Subjects: environmental health, Geography, health risk and incident analysis, energy systems, environmental resource management, sustainability and energy, consumer economics, construction type
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here