Barriers and enablers for scaled-up adoption of compressed earth blocks in Egypt

Hafez, H; El-Mahdy, D and Marsh, A T M (2023) Barriers and enablers for scaled-up adoption of compressed earth blocks in Egypt. Building Research & Information, 51(7), pp. 783-797. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Compressed earth blocks (CEBs) are a low-cost, low-carbon construction product, which are well-suited for masonry infill in the Global South. A knowledge gap remains around the technical and socio-economic barriers to CEB adoption. A combined survey and interview study was carried out among architects, CEB manufacturers, and academics within Egypt: firstly, to explore technical and socio-economic barriers to greater adoption of CEBs for masonry infill, and secondly, to identify potential enablers. Many technical challenges still exist, despite the fact that building codes for CEB in Egypt were introduced in 2019. The majority of respondents agreed that socio-economic barriers are more significant than technical barriers. These included CEBs being unfamiliar to most architects and builders, and that most clients perceive CEBs as 'low-quality' or 'inaesthetic'. Most respondents believed that CEBs can achieve ≥25% market share for masonry in Egypt. However, CEB press supply is likely to be a major barrier to scale-up. Suggested enablers included tailored marketing suggestions for low-/middle-income and high-income clients, and deciding at the earliest possible design stage whether to manufacture CEBs on-site or off-site. Mapping the enablers across stakeholders showed that more research is needed to understand the views of CEB press manufacturers and government officials.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: compressed earth blocks; global south; socio-economic barriers; stabilized earth construction; survey-based methods
Index terms: design stage, income, low-carbon construction, survey, Egypt, marketing, builder, market share, manufacturer, architect, building code, mapping, interview
Subjects: economic analysis, spatial and geospatial analysis, regulatory law, market analysis, business, professional practice, sustainability and energy, profession, Geography, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here