Liang, R; Li, R and Chong, H Y (2023) Sustainable supplier selection for prefabricated megaprojects during COVID-19: A novel large group decision-making model. Building Research & Information, 51(5), pp. 533-554. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Prefabrication in construction has broad development prospects owing to its sustainability and strong support from the government. Prefabricated components, as the primary part of prefabrication megaprojects, affect the project completion and performance directly. Therefore, selecting appropriate prefabricated component sustainable suppliers (PCSSs) is a paramount task for the success of prefabricated megaprojects. This study expounds on the characteristics of PCSS selection from three aspects, namely the difference between prefabricated and traditional ones, sustainability requirements, and the impact of COVID-19, and indicates the issues that should be considered when choosing PCSS. An evaluation criterion is extracted and applied to the primary data from 4 PCSSs and 45 decision makers (DMs) of a prefabricated megaproject. Finally, a novel intuitionistic fuzzy large-group decision-making model is proposed. This model considers criterion weights and DM weights, as well as hesitation, ambiguity and consistency. The results indicate that the proposed model has strong robustness and can meet the decision-making needs of different DMs. The model extends the body of knowledge in the context of supply chain disruptions and digital bidding during the COVID-19 pandemic based on its more comprehensive criteria for the PCSS selection and new approaches for the weighting and uncertain evaluation throughout the decision-making process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | COVID-19; intuitionistic fuzzy lgdm; prefabrication megaprojects; supplier selection; sustainable procurement |
| Index terms: | bidding, decision-making process, body of knowledge, prefabricated component, prefabrication, decision-making, pandemic, COVID-19, megaproject |
| Subjects: | bidding, knowledge management, strategic project management, health risk and incident analysis, decision analysis, design methods, building construction |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Design Practice, Risk Management, Information Management, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here