Liu, F; Chang-Richards, A; Wang, K I K and Dirks, K N (2023) Critical indoor environmental factors affecting productivity: Perspectives from university staff and postgraduate students. Building Research & Information, 51(6), pp. 730-745. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of buildings plays an important role in affecting building occupants' comfort, health and well-being. However, there is limited understanding of the critical IEQ factors that affect occupants' work productivity in university office buildings. By surveying 204 people (72 university staff members and 132 postgraduate students) in a tertiary education institution in New Zealand, this research aimed to identify and rank the critical IEQ factors concerning their perceived productivity and how the perceived importance of these factors differed between staff and student cohorts. Statistical analysis identified a total of 16 IEQ factors as important in affecting work productivity, and 15 of them, except cleanliness of the office, could be grouped into four categories: (1) thermal comfort and lighting; (2) acoustics and privacy comfort; (3) spatial comfort and (4) aesthetics and views. Based on the identified critical IEQ factors, a framework was developed and can be used by building facility managers and designers in the tertiary education sector to optimize design solutions to improve building performance that is more conducive to their occupants. The findings from this research can inform the inclusion of design features that will enable staff and students using these buildings to achieve better productivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | indoor environment quality; New Zealand; office buildings; productivity; tertiary sector; university |
| Index terms: | postgraduate, privacy, environmental factor, education institution, manager, tertiary, surveying, health and wellbeing, building performance, comfort, indoor environmental quality, thermal comfort, New Zealand, aesthetic, productivity, office building, indoor environment, designer, statistical analysis |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, environmental health, environmental engineering, professional ethics, higher education, educational institutions, occupational health and safety management, Geography, management, factor and component analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data science, environmental science, curriculum development, practitioner, mental health and wellbeing, construction type, profession |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Education, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here