COVID-19: A catalyst for revitalizing mixed-use urban centers? The case of Paris

Machline, E; Pearlmutter, D; Cohen, C and Schwartz, M (2023) COVID-19: A catalyst for revitalizing mixed-use urban centers? The case of Paris. Building Research & Information, 51(1), pp. 39-55. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, the French public authorities have changed regulations to allow commercial building conversions into housing. The COVID-19 crisis has affected the global economy, social connections, environmental trajectories and energy demand/supply. Countries have been considering measures to reduce the pandemic’s long-term impact and since the beginning of 2020, national governments have recommended that companies facilitate remote work. Thus, COVID-19 has prompted some office building depopulation. With working from home expected to continue after the pandemic, due to technological, environmental and economic considerations, there is a growing impetus to convert empty office space into residential uses. The present research aims, through the Parisian case study, to consider the impacts of the pandemic and the acceleration of homeworking. Using a mixed qualitative and quantitative methodology, the study aims to (1) critically analyse the policy tools implemented by the Paris municipality following the COVID-19 pandemic to accelerate commercial building conversions and (2) evaluate the potential for such conversions, considering former policies. We found that adaptive reuse policies have been implemented following the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis. However, according to the collected data, conversion potential is limited, due to the continuing demand for office space despite the changes and economic considerations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building reuse; circular economy; COVID-19 impacts; remote working; urban planning; 'green' building
Index terms: circular economy, office building, adaptive reuse, remote working, energy demand, case study, conversion, office space, pandemic, acceleration, policy tools, Paris, COVID-19, public authority, housing, municipality, urban planning, regulation, methodology, commercial building
Subjects: project controls, administrative law, political science, management, health risk and incident analysis, manufacturing engineering, research methods, sustainable design, Geography, urban planning, energy systems, data collection methods, construction type, policy studies
Topics: Legal Issues, Human Resources, Time Control, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Governance, Sustainability, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here