Affinity towards flexible housing–a study among homeowners in Germany

Mergel, C; Decker, T and Menrad, K (2023) Affinity towards flexible housing–a study among homeowners in Germany. Building Research & Information, 51(8), pp. 871-880. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Uncertain rental and real estate prices, demographic changes and the diversity of household types are increasing pressure on the housing market. One way of dealing with these challenges is flexible housing, which is designed to adapt to changing needs and patterns, both social and technical. It enables buildings to be used for longer periods, which increases their long-term sustainability by reducing not only their material and energy consumption but also the level of environmental pollution. The aim of this study is to examine to what extent criteria of flexible housing are relevant to homeowners and which factors can be used to predict the importance. By conducting an online survey of 519 homeowners in Germany, we were able to identify ten factors that can be used to predict the perceived importance of flexible housing. These are the number of rooms in the property, the size of the residential area, the household size, homeowner’s age, environmental awareness, importance to the homeowner of stability and longevity, accessibility, value stability, use of renewable materials and recyclability of construction materials. This study contributes to literature by identifying criteria for flexible housing from the homeowner’s perspective. It is the first study to analyse this question empirically.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; consumer habits; flexibility; sustainable buildings
Index terms: sustainable building, construction material, homeowner, survey, energy consumption, housing, accessibility, household, renewable material, stability, Germany, pollution, consumer habit, environmental awareness, residential area, real estate, adaptation
Subjects: sustainable construction, sociology, construction type, consumer economics, inclusive design, Geography, structural engineering, data collection methods, demography, building materials, environmental health, real estate economics, environmental behaviour, user focus, zoning, energy systems
Topics: Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here