New, K; Tyler, A; Friday, A; Hazas, M and Gormally, A (2023) Space temperature policy towards net-zero: Recommendations from a systematic review of UK HEI heating policies. Building Research & Information, 51(2), pp. 223-239. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The UK government has committed to reducing its carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050. Higher education institutions (HEIs) are high energy users, with the largest proportion of their energy demand for space heating; an area still dominated by carbon-intensive fuels. This research addresses the UK HEI space temperature policy landscape, making direct links between space temperature policy and carbon management, advocating the development of evidence-based policies as a critical tool for reducing carbon emissions within the sector. Sixty-six space temperature policies were reviewed, and five experienced energy managers were interviewed to understand the range, development and use of space temperature policies in UK HEIs. The research identified a lack of consistency across these policies, leading to missed opportunities for making energy and carbon savings. The research highlights gaps in the available data and literature needed to connect policy to its effectiveness, and identifies the use of policy as a defensive tool against complaints rather than an active driver of energy reduction. A series of recommendations are proposed for national and institutional policymakers, suggesting areas for improvement and future research to facilitate effective development and practice in space temperature policy towards net-zero.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | education; energy; hei; policy; space heating and cooling; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | systematic literature review, complaint, energy reduction, higher education institution, evidence-based policy, effectiveness, thermal comfort, carbon emission, space heating, savings, manager, energy demand |
| Subjects: | educational institutions, energy systems, practitioner, conflict resolution, mechanical systems, public policy, environmental engineering, research evaluation and metrics, performance management, economic analysis, climate science |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Governance, Business Strategy, Education, Quality Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here